Lone Star Lines

Quarterly Newsletter    October - December 2004 Issue


Click here for printable version


Composite Financials for Texas Surplus Lines Insurers Show Improved Results for 2003

EFS Quick Tips
SLSOT Customer Service Results
Helpful Hints
Comparison of SLSOT Premium Processed by Line of Business


From the Lone Star Lines - October - December Issue 2004
Surplus Lines Stamping Office of Texas

Composite Financials for Texas Surplus Lines
Insurers Show Improved Results for 2003

by Brian D. Wilds, CPA, ASLI, Director of Financial Analysis & Accounting

One of the important functions of the SLSOT is the evaluation of surplus lines insurers. We evaluate each currently eligible insurer annually and also evaluate insurers seeking initial eligibility. One component of the evaluation process is a five year 'financial summary' page for each insurer that is published on our website. The exhibit on page 2 is a composite of selected financial data for all currently eligible insurers. It highlights the characteristics of their 2003 results compared to similar data for the prior three years. (This composite financial statement data excludes Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (Lloyd's), as its financial information is not compatible with this compilation.)

The state of the surplus lines market is good and showed improvement in 2003. Aggregate capital and surplus (C&S) for eligible surplus lines insurers was $55.8 billion at the end of 2003, an increase of 33% over the prior year's level. Average and median C&S also increased 30% and 25% respectively. (Lloyd's underwriting capacity increased to $26.78 billion beginning 2004 from $25.76 billion beginning 2003). C&S increased due to capital infusions, net income and the entry of new eligible insurers. Of the 167 eligible insurers in the composite, 148 insurers increased C&S, 133 insurers increased unassigned surplus (retained earnings) and only 17 had unassigned surplus deficits, all improvements over prior years.

For the first time in many years there was an aggregate underwriting gain of $923 million, with the average underwriting gain $5.5 million. Ninety-four of 167 insurers reported underwriting gains. Net income after tax has been positive for several years, but there was more than a six-fold aggregate and average increase in 2003. There were 146 of 167 insurers reporting net income.

Gross premium increased 22% and net premium increased 23% in 2003. Leverage ratios fell (125% gross premium to C&S and 61% net premium to C&S). This is explained by the large increases in total capital and surplus.

Positive cash flow from operations was reported by 107 of the 125 foreign (U.S. domiciled) insurers.

The combined ratio for this composite fell a whopping 13 points to 91% from the prior year's 104%. This is the first time in over a decade this ratio has been below 100%.

Other indicators of the health of the surplus lines insurance market in Texas are:

There were six new submissions for eligibility in 2003 and twelve in 2002. The increases in new submissions coincide with the hardening of the P&C market and continues a trend started in 2001.

Twenty-four insurers received improved SLSOT priority ratings, while only 12 insurers worsened in priority.

Surplus lines premium was 9.1% of total Texas property and casualty premium in 2003, compared to 8.3% in 2002.

Average premium per policy processed increased from $5,831 in 2002 to $5,915 in 2003 and at September 30, 2004 was $6,246.

The eligible surplus lines insurers making up the Texas surplus lines market are stronger than in recent years and the trends appear positive. As of September 30, 2004 there were 168 insurers (including Lloyd's) operating as eligible surplus lines insurers compared to 166 at September 30, 2003. At the beginning of 2004 there were 163 eligible insurers for a net increase of five thus far in 2004. Prior to 2002, the number of eligible insurers declined each of the past 14 years, from a high of 226 in 1988. Currently, 125 foreign (U.S. domiciled) insurers, Underwriters at Lloyds (64 syndicates) and 42 alien (non-U.S. domiciled) insurers are eligible. The market share (as of September 30, 2004) is similar to the prior year with foreign insurers writing 79%, Lloyd's writing 15%, and other alien insurers writing 6% of the Texas surplus lines premium. The top ten individual surplus lines writers in Texas commanded 50% of the market at September 30, 2004, slightly down from 52% in 2003 and 53% in 2002. Of the 168 insurers currently eligible, only four insurers are not affiliated with an insurance group. These write less than 1% of the Texas S/L market. Compiling premium statistics by group affiliation reflects the top ten groups plus Lloyd's wrote 66% of the total Texas S/L premium in 2003 and 2002, but only 61% through September 30, 2004.

Observers of the P&C market offer many varied conclusions, although the consensus suggests downward pressure on premium rates. Improved equity market returns, underwriting profit, net income and increased capacity indicate the P&C industry will become more competitive and reduce pricing in 2005. Offsetting trends may be the recent series of catastrophe losses and the need to recover reserve strength depleted over the past 15 to 20 years. Stamping office analysis of activity through September 2004 reflects continued premium increases (15.1% overall) and a 5.6% increase in average premium per policy. Based on composite financial data the surplus lines market in Texas remains strong.


Calendar Year 2003 - 2000
Comprised of currently Eligible Insurers*
      2003 2002 2001 2000
  Capital & Surplus 55,849,152,951 42,062,637,753 38,368,679,185 39,872,702,705
  Average 334,426,066 258,052,992 236,843,699 243,126,236
  Median 57,339,000 45,941,353 38,649,500 39,287,777
  Underwriting Gain (Loss) 923,880,897 (763,346,938) (2,841,152,243) (1,937,712,890)
  Average 5,532,221 (4,712,018) (17,537,977) (11,815,322)
  Median 0 0 (1,586,406) (1,127,506)
  Net Income After Tax 5,072,091,271 814,008,648 593,388,231 773,726,058
  Average 30,371,804 5,055,954 3,662,890 4,717,842
  Median 2,853,986 1,520,000 1,121,624 1,837,028
  Return on Policyholder Surplus 10.4% 4.4% 3.1% 5.1%
  Gross Premium    69,968,959,001    57,423,352,196   38,788,001,284    30,880,805,231
  Average         418,975,802         354,465,137        239,432,107          188,297,593
  Net Premium    34,276,556,365    27,939,361,255   20,923,554,440    16,239,068,194
  Average         205,248,841         172,465,193        129,157,743            99,018,709
  Gross Premium to Surplus Ratio 125% 137% 101% 77%
  Net Premium to Surplus Ratio 61% 66% 55% 41%
  SLSOT Premium Processed**      2,493,256,428      2,074,174,528     1,168,870,342          851,167,070
  Average            15,390,472            12,724,997             7,492,759              5,221,884
  Combined Ratio 91% 104% 111% 106%
    Other Measures
  Insurers Included 166 166 162 164
  New Submissions for Eligibility 6 12 0 5
  Upgraded SLSOT priority rating 24 30 22 27
  Downgraded SLSOT priority rating 14 25 36 26
  Increased capital & surplus 148 123 103 96
  Underwriting gains 94 85 56 59
  Net income 146 121 127 131
  Positive cash from operations 107 106 87 91
           

From the Lone Star Lines - October - December Issue 2004
Surplus Lines Stamping Office of Texas

EFS Quick Tips

Delete Transactions can only be processed in the current accounting month. Once the month has been closed, you must use a Reversal Transaction.

When entering transactions, especially Reversals and Deletes, make sure you select the correct transaction type.

If you are unsure if an item has been filed with our office, you can run the Ad-Hoc Report -SLRP57Mod - Individual Policy Transaction Listing with Securities. This will help eliminate being tagged for "Parent Policy Not Found" as well as duplicate entries.

Set a suspense flag in your own calendar with a reminder to change your EFS password (especially if you do not use the EFS on a regular basis).
 

From the Lone Star Lines - October - December Issue 2004
Surplus Lines Stamping Office of Texas

SLSOT Customer Service Survey Results

Thanks to all of you responding to the Stamping Office's recent Customer Service Survey. Responses have provided some interesting information and valuable feedback to us.

Generally, there appears to be a high level of satisfaction with the services provided by SLSOT. Nearly 90% of the respondents worked for either a resident or nonresident surplus lines agency. More than 85% contact the Stamping Office primarily to discuss policy-filing issues. Sixty percent have been dealing with our office for longer than five years (and 13% since we first opened our doors in 1988).

The table indicates survey responses regarding overall service received from the Stamping Office.

Overall  
Excellent 55%
Good 34%
Average 10%

Professionalism of Staff
Excellent 68%
Good 32%

Response Time
Excellent 62%
Good 31%
Average 6%
Below Average 1%

Helpfulness of Staff
Excellent 72%
Good 22%
Average 4%
Below Average 1%

Knowledge of Staff
Excellent 64%
Good 26%
Average 8%
Below Average 3%

Respondents also gave high marks to the EFS Help Desk, SLSOT's web site, Lone Star Lines newsletter, and monthly bulletins. Regarding the Electronic Filing System, 36% were already registered to use it. Another 29% planned to e-file over the next one to two years. However, 35% indicated no immediate plans to file policies electronically. Reasons given included budget constraints (5%), minimal need/low filing volume (26%), concern over availability of staff and time resources (12%), problems with current agency system (11%), and no awareness the EFS was available (10%). Fifty-nine percent of respondents were frequent or infrequent attendees at SLSOT agent seminars. However, 41% indicated they had never attended.

Individual SLSOT staff receiving favorable comments in the survey included Cheyenne Norment and Janet Kantor from the EFS Help Desk, Melody Lopez and Elaine White from Data Services, Monte Hall in Agent Services, and Dalen Chisholm in the GM Department.

We are always interested in your comments and opinions as to how we can do a better job. Give us a call or send an e-mail and tell us what's on your mind.

From the Lone Star Lines - October - December Issue 2004
Surplus Lines Stamping Office of Texas

Helpful Hints

Using the Checklist for Submitting Items to the Stamping Office will help you reduce the number of tags you receive. It can be found in your procedure manual as well as on our website.

  Tag memos are not a part of the policy so corrections must be done by use of an endorsement or amended dec page. Be sure you include the tag memo when submitting a correction.

From the Lone Star Lines - October - December Issue 2004
Surplus Lines Stamping Office of Texas

Helpful Hints

Be sure the Surplus Lines Agent name you show on the Transmittal and Verification Slip is either the name just as it's shown on the license or else the approved trade name. If you have multiple licenses, be sure the license number is the correct one for the name of the surplus lines agent/agency.

The green Transmittal and Verification Slip is for security corrections only. This form is available for download from our website at www.slsot.org. Please do not mix these in with a regular batch. Security corrections should be submitted separately.

From the Lone Star Lines - October - December Issue 2004
Surplus Lines Stamping Office of Texas

Comparison of SLSOT Premium Processed 
by Line of Business

Annual Statement
Line of Business
Premium
through

9/30/04
Premium
through
9/31/03
Percent
Change
1 Fire (incl. allied lines) $431,445,167 $388,931,555 10.9%
2 Allied lines $16,816,917 $21,223,839 -20.8%
3 Farmowners multiple peril $844,217 $627,027 34.6%
4 Homeowners multiple peril $74,104,847 $75,149,371 -1.4%
5 Commercial multiple peril $42,411,274 $29,941,392 41.7%
8 Ocean marine $3,347,469 $5,442,851 -38.5%
9 Inland marine $33,156,320 $22,488,259 47.4%
11 Medical malpractice $38,238,109 $32,966,025 16.0%
12 Earthquake ($11,461) $68,115 -116.8%
13 Group accident & health $52,127,372 $52,105,684 0.0%
15 All other A&H $473,592 $11,869 3890.3%
17 Other liability $795,242,795 $590,094,247 34.8%
18 Products liability $27,908,387 $21,500,081 29.8%